> Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Not everyone has sgml tools on their local machine, do they? > > > But everyone committing changes to docs does, or should have, sgml tools > > on *their* machines. Right?? > > I think it's a bad idea to create such a policy; anything we do that > raises the bar for docs contributions will just mean that we have less > and worse documentation. Hasn't our past policy always been "submit > whatever you want, even plain text, and we'll fix the markup later"? > > If you want to see the effects of such a policy, you need look no > further than Jan, who still has not committed one line of documentation > about the pgstats views because he doesn't want to be bothered with > SGML. > > If Bruce wants to expend a lot of cycles on his machine to provide fast > turnaround of docs changes, that's fine with me.
I also have the SGML build log with errors in _red_! Nifty feature. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
