Kevin Grittner wrote: > Once I sort out the subject issue, I'm about ready to try to start > generating a very rough prototype of predicate locking. I don't want > to start a discussion of those details on this thread, because it > seems to me that a decision on the subject issue affects significant > details about how I go about that. > > Consider this the 5,000 foot overview. Previous thread contain much > more, and references to more authoritative documents. > > This is not a small effort. I'll be surprised if it comes in at less > than 2,000 lines of code, plus documentation and tests. I'm not > really expecting it to make the next release after 8.5. With some > luck, maybe the next release after that. And that's all conditional > on our CIO approving programming time for the effort. I'm currently > trying to dig in far enough to provide more accurate estimates and > time lines to facilitate approval. > > Hopefully I haven't just scared you off of your offer to help. ;-)
Thanks, I do understand it better now. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
