"David E. Wheeler" <da...@kineticode.com> writes: > On Dec 30, 2009, at 4:17 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >> That doesn't seem like enough to guarantee that you've got the right >> function.
> As Tim said elsewhere: >> I don't see either of those as significant issues: "If you need more >> control for a particular SP then don't use SP::* to call that SP." If the thing actively fails when there's more than one possible match, that might be ok. Randomly choosing a match, not so much. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers