On tor, 2009-12-31 at 13:44 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > > Tom Lane wrote: > > >> BTW, it looks like the patch is showing a manual change to > > >> pg_config.h.in. Don't do that. Run autoheader. > > > > > I wasn't aware autoheader existed. Is that new or has it alwasy been > > > part of autoconf? > > > > It's always been there, or at least for many years. pg_config.h.in > > really ought to be thought of the same as configure: you don't edit > > it, you just generate it. > > Well, that's pretty confusing considering it has a .in suffix, just like > configure.in, which we do edit, but I get your point.
I realize it's easy to miss, but the first line of pg_config.h.in tells that it is generated. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
