Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: > On lör, 2010-01-02 at 17:34 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> As for the overhead, these queries are not zero-maintenance. I still >> think that the usefulness of tab completion here is pretty darn >> minimal, >> since most people are more likely to rely on default_do_language;
> We really don't have any data on that, and it doesn't seem all that > likely to me. I'm not really objecting to putting in the patch entirely. I'm objecting to carrying an extra completion query for it. I don't think hiding languages with laninline=0 improves its usefulness at all, let alone enough to justify extra maintenance burden. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers