On Fri, Jan 01, 2010 at 03:31:58PM -0500, Kris Jurka wrote: > The JDBC driver does want "cancel if active" behavior. The JDBC API > specifies Statement.cancel() where Statement is running one particular > backend query. So it really does want to cancel just that one query. > Already this is tough because of the asynchronous nature of the cancel > protocol and the inability to say exactly what should be cancelled.
I've looked in the JDBC documentation but I don't quickly see how they expect this to work with transactions. What is being proposed seems to me to be: If statement active: put transaction in aborted state If no statement active: do nothing However, I see that the documentation wants to be able to abort a *specific* statement, which is not being proposed here. Can that be implemented on top of the current proposal? Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <klep...@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > Please line up in a tree and maintain the heap invariant while > boarding. Thank you for flying nlogn airlines.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
