On tis, 2010-01-05 at 16:48 +0000, Dave Page wrote: > On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > I would have thought Microsoft would have a better solution than this > > for managing 64-bit libraries. Or am I too optimistic about Redmond's > > competence? > > They have two separate installation directories for 32 and 64 bit > packages. With PostgreSQL though, we'll quite possibly be shipping > both 32 and 64 bit components in the same installer, and thus going > into the same installation directory.
Can't the installer install things into two separate directories? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers