On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:06 PM, David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 08:50:25PM -0700, u235sentinel wrote: >> Robert Haas wrote: >> > >> >Getting full? >> > >> >...Robert >> > >> Ok. Bad analogy. We have the tables setup to write data according >> to the month it was loaded. We have a December table, a January >> table and so on. Basically following the examples given on the 8.4 >> web site. >> >> I'm thinking it would be nice if there was a way to automatically >> add the next month without having to script it all out. > > There's no good reason you can't add 5 years' worth of tables right up > front.
Different people might want different naming conventions for those tables, too. We've heard this request before so maybe we should consider it, but it seems like a lot of work for something that's not too hard to code up for yourself, and can be handled much more flexibly that way. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
