On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 11:41:46AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: > > Next question: what do we do if a direct-called function calls > > return_next()? That at least must surely take effect in the caller's > > context - the callee won't have anywhere to stash the the results at all. > > Whatever do you mean by "take effect in the caller's context"? I surely > hope it's not "return the row to the caller's caller, who likely isn't > expecting anything of the kind". > > I suspect Tim will just answer that he isn't going to try to > short-circuit the call path for set-returning functions.
For 8.5 I don't think I'll even attempt direct inter-plperl-calls. I'll just do a nicely-sugared wrapper around spi_exec_prepared(). Either via import, as I outlined earlier, or Garick Hamlin's suggestion of attributes - which is certainly worth exploring. Tim. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
