On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 08:40:28PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > A parallel psql seems to me a better way to go. We talked about that > a while ago, but I don't recall what happened to it.
Greg Stark had a patch a couple of years ago. Dunno what happened to it since then. Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
