On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> I am tempted to say we should clamp down and go into damage control >> mode sooner rather than later. > > The more I see of the HS patch, the more I think the same. But my > proposal for "damage control mode" would be to immediately punt > everything else to the next release and focus our energies exclusively > on HS *and* SR. In terms of the "big picture" for the project, those > are headline items, and everything else is just trivia that the average > user won't even notice.
100% agree. Whether or not individual users or their clients on this list need both features, as a project we absolutely need to get them out there to further boost our reputation as a credible alternative to Oracle, SQL Server, DB2 and friends - which seem particularly important to do whilst MySQL is in so much flux and people are watching us closely. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
