> Presuming enough reviewers (which should be the case this time given the > expectation that submitters also review), the suggested pacing here now > has every patch passing through a round of review and potentially one > update within ten days.
If we *don't* have enough reviewers, though, I think Robert is within his rights as CFM to decide that large patches which are appearing in this CF for the first time do not get reviewed. We discussed that possibility back when we set the schedule, and I think it's still possible that we'll need to resort to it. --Josh Berkus -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
