On sön, 2010-01-10 at 15:27 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote: > On 1/10/10 2:34 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > On tor, 2009-11-05 at 19:24 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > >> I'm planning to work on typed tables support. The idea is that you > >> create a table out of a composite type (as opposed to the other way > >> around, which is currently done automatically). > > Nice. Can we come up with a better name for the feature, though? > "Composite Type Tables"? "Type-Table Inheritance"?
"Typed tables" is the official SQL standard name for the feature, and it's also used in DB2 documentation. So I kind of would prefer to keep it. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
