Dimitri Fontaine <dfonta...@hi-media.com> wrote: >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2009-08/msg00053.php > > I knew I was forgetting about something, thanks for the reminder. > Damn it, patents. I'm not sure that there was anything there which absolutely ruled out using LZ0; all of the patents still in effect seemed to be around picky little details of *how* you use it. Others seem to have picked their way through that particular mine field. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
