On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > I am concerned that knowledge of this new read-only replication user > would have to be spread all over the backend code, which is really not > something we should be doing at this stage in 8.5 development. I am > also thinking such a special user might fall out of work on mandatory > access control, so maybe we should just require super-user for 8.5 and > revisit this for 8.6.
OK. I leave that code as it is. If the majority feel it's overkill to require a superuser privilege when authenticating the standby, we can just drop it later. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
