"Kevin Grittner" <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> wrote: > This is the milestone of having full serializable behavior, albeit > with horrible performance, using the simplest implementation > possible. A tad too simple, as it turns out. It did it's main job of providing a simple milestone to identify code organization and lock points, but I'd have to jigger some things to make S2PL work with snapshot isolation which aren't needed for SSI. So, for those keeping score, I'm moving on down the checklist to get to the SSI implementation, rather than futzing with code which would just be thrown away. No need for anyone to test for full serializable behavior. Comments on technique welcome. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers