Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> I'm actually fairly uncomfortable with the notion that something buried >> deep within the src/backend tree is going to reach over and cause libpq >> to get built. Maybe the real answer is that you put walreceiver in the >> wrong place, and it ought to be under src/bin/.
> That feels even more wrong to me. Walreceiver is a postmaster > subprocess, tightly integrated with the rest of the backend. [ shrug... ] pg_dump, to take one example, is considerably more "tightly integrated" with the backend than walreceiver is. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers