On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Joshua D. Drake <j...@commandprompt.com> >> wrote: >>>> Uh, do we really want to call this "replication" rather than archive log >>>> streaming or something. It seems "replication" is a generic term and >>>> will confuse people who are using other replication solutions like >>>> Slony. >>> +1, it is not replication. I would call it something like continuous >>> archiving or streaming pitr >> >> Of course "PITR" does stand for "point-in-time replication"... > > I'm not sure if you're joking, but PITR actually stands for > Point-In-Time *Recovery*.
Oops. No, not joking, just wrong. But I'm still wondering why this isn't replication. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
