On Sun, 2010-01-17 at 22:57 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > > > It would be good if there was a keepalive WAL record with a > timestamp on it generated every N seconds while in streaming mode. > > Yeah, that would help. In streaming replication we could also send > such timestamp as a separate message, not within WAL.
Is that something you're working on? Do we need a new record type for that, is there a handy record type to bounce from? -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
