On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> Updated patch attached. I still think this is a bizarre API. > > Well, if we had it to do over I'm sure we'd have done it differently, > but the functions are there now and we aren't going to change them ...
I agree, but I don't feel the need to repeat the mistakes we've already made by slavishly copying them into new places. I think as long as we're adding a new function, we should make it behave sanely. We could even take the opportunity to go back and add a saner version of PQescapeStringConn. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
