Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 4:27 AM, Heikki Linnakangas > <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> Magnus Hagander wrote: >>> Actually, such a correction patch would be nice and short. Attached >>> for reference. Thoughts? >> That seems better than rewinding the history all the way back to August. > > It seems pretty horrible to me. That means we'll have a range of > times 5 months long for which the git repository doesn't match CVS. > > Admittedly, I understand that this is going to be extremely painful > for anyone who (like Heikki) has to manage a substantial private > branch.
I won't object to rewinding, it should be fairly painless to rebase. > I haven't been in a hurry to see us move to git because the git mirror > is, for most purposes, just as good. But if the git mirror is going > to start sucking, then I'm in a hurry. The way I used to work before > I learned git seems laughable now, and I do NOT want to go back. My feelings exactly. I'm not in a hurry to switch because the mirror is good enough for me. But if *I* have to spend time fixing the mirror every few weeks, I'm not happy. Magnus has been kind enough to handle the last mirror troubles, but I believe hë́ shares the feeling. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
