Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> writes: > Yeah, a lot of that logic and states is completely unnecessary until we > have a synchronous mode. Even then, it seems complex.
I hope we'll find something less complex, what I proposed is heavily inspired from londiste (Skytools) table addition to a replication set (parallel COPY), which works fine. > Here's what I've been hacking: [...] > So there's just two states: > > 1. Recovering from archive > 2. Streaming > > We start from 1, and switch state at error. Oh yes that's even more simple! > This gives nice behavior from a user point of view. Standby tries to > make progress using either the archive or streaming, whichever becomes > available first. So tools like pitrtools or walmgr.py will certainly continue being necessary to use in 9.0, right? -- dim -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
