On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Alexey Klyukin <al...@waki.ru> wrote: > I think elog(WARNING) is less surprising for the end-user, unless there's an > objection strong enough to include it into the documentation :)
I think the main possible objection would what Simon just wrote on the other thread - that it's been this way for a while, and while someone might think that a different decision about how to handle it would have been better, there may be people counting on the current behavior who will have to spend time and perhaps money making changes if we change it. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
