On Sun, 2010-01-24 at 17:04 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > If we have a default (for DO and CREATE FUNCTION), why not hard-wire the > > default to plpgsql? > > I don't see any strong argument for having a default for CREATE > FUNCTION. The original argument for having a GUC for DO was that > plpgsql wasn't built in; now that it is, I think a case could > be made for dropping default_do_language in favor of a hardwired > default.
I would prefer having the option, but removing it completely does at least solve the bizarre inconsistency I've highlighted. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
