Magnus Hagander wrote: > 2010/1/29 Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com>:
> > (There's a badly needed CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS in this code BTW) > > Incidentally, I ran across the exact same issue with a non-greedy > regexp with a client earlier this week, and put on my TODO to figure > out a good place to stick a check for interrupts. Does this mean I > don't have to, because you're on it? ;) No, sorry :-( -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
