On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 22:05 +0100, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > hmm makes sense from the HS side - but I think to make a case for a GUC > it would help a lot to see actual numbers(as in benchmarks) showing how > much of a hit it is to the master.
Agreed, though my approach to benchmarking was to provide the mechanism by which it was possible to benchmark. I didn't presume to be able to cover wide area with benchmarking tests just for this. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
