On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> Hmm, in that case, I think the problem is that this function has no >> comment explaining its intended charter. > > That's certainly a big problem, but a comment won't fix the fact that > the name is misleading. We need both a comment and a name change.
I think you're probably right, but it's not clear what the new name should be until we have a comment explaining what the function is responsible for. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
