On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 02:32:47PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Joshua Tolley <eggyk...@gmail.com> writes: > > I'd really like to see the data from pg_config and pg_controldata available > > through SQL, such as by adding output to pg_show_all_settings(), or adding > > new > > SRFs named something like pg_config() and pg_controldata(). Does this make > > as > > much sense to the rest of the world as it does to me? In particular it's > > useful to be able to find $libdir without requiring pg_config, as some > > packagers tend not to include it in anything put the -dev packages, but all > > those settings seem useful to have on hand, and in at least most cases > > shouldn't be tough to expose via SQL. Comments? > > I wonder whether there's a security issue there. Telling an attacker > whether you've been built with feature X seems like possibly useful > info that he couldn't otherwise get without local machine access. > In particular, we already try to avoid exposing server filesystem > path information.
I'd wondered the same thing, without spending enough time on it to come to a conclusion beyond "perhaps making the functions executable only by superuser would suffice". -- Joshua Tolley / eggyknap End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
