Tom Lane wrote: > Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> writes: > >> Barring objections I'm going to press ahead with completing and > >> committing this; then in a separate patch remove VACUUM FULL INPLACE. > > > Was it our determination that we could remove VFI if we eliminated the > > system catalogs? I'm fine with it, I just thought some people had a > > marginal use case for VFI. > > I thought the consensus was to remove it if possible. There may still > be some "marginal" use cases, but they don't justify the work that'd > be needed to make it play safely with HS; let alone fixing the other > longstanding gotchas with it, like the double-commit risk.
Oh, yea, I remember, HS killed it because of the work required to make FULL work for 9.0. Thanks. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
