Dimitri Fontaine wrote: > Marko Tiikkaja <marko.tiikk...@cs.helsinki.fi> writes: > > The documentation has definitely improved from the last time Robert > > looked at it, but I fear it still needs some more work. I'm willing to > > do that work, but I need something concrete. > > It seems to me documentation is required to get into the source tree > before beta, and as we see with some other patches it's definitely the > case even with our newer procedures that some code gets in without its > documentation properly finished. I guess this amounts to the commiter > willing to fill up the docs later on.
Eh? Previously we allowed code to go in with documentation to be written after feature freeze. Is this no longer acceptable? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
