On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > That's actually a bit questionable, always has been even in pg_standby. > It adds a constant 1 s delay to the recovery each WAL file, which > effectively rate-limits the WAL recovery to 16MB per second. I think we > should rather add a warning to the docs, suggesting the copy-then-rename > method on Windows.
Right. Adding a warning to the docs looks enough. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
