Hi all,

I've combined the review suggestions of Jan Urbański, Scott Bailey, and
others.
This was a lot harder, then I had foreseen; and I took my time to do it
the right way (hope you agree!).

BTW. really appreciate your efforts, so far, to enlighten me on nuub errors/mistakes in the previous version.

Additional improvement (hence the V2):
two extra functions: xpath_value_text and xpath_value_strict
Both are quite general: xpath_value_text maps everything to text, except nodeset. xpath_value_strict has to be told exactly what to expect.
xpath_value_text(text xpath, xml doc [, namespace]) returns text
xpath_value_strict(anyelement typexample, text xpath, xml doc [, namespace]) returns anyelement
 See the doc for further explanation.
I chose this approach, as opposed to xpath_value_string/number/boolean for a couple of reasons: - We want postgresql functions, with postgresql types. The functions should fit postgresql usage and hide libxml parlance. - Functions in pg_catalog should be destined for broad use, not just satisfy the adhoc desire of the implementer. - Function synopsis should be adequate to withstand libxml extension or improvements (libxml3?) - Construction of XPath expressions for value retrieval is not trivial. A precise calling syntax, hopefully, focuses the user to select the right expressions. - Loose implementation with "autocasting" opens the door for unwanted injection possibilities.

Lastly, when in need of a xpath_value_string (et al), it can easily be added by the user through:
CREATE FUNCTION xpath_value_string(text, xml) RETURNS text AS $$
SELECT xpath_value_strict('a'::text,$1,$2);
$$ LANGUAGE SQL;

Points fixed:
- source code indentation. (manually though, can't get pgindent to work
properly)
- Doc entries with some examples
- test/regress entries
- Detailed directions from Jan Urbanski on ereport and PG_TRY/CATCH.

Here's a shortlist of subjects you should definetely review (aka I'me not certain these are up to standards)
- calling style in xpath_value_strict with typexample. I really like it,
but I haven't seen such an approach elsewhere in the API.
- tone and style in doc. I'me not native English speaker and had to learn DocBook along the way. - insertion in catalog/pg_proc.h. Just took some free oid numbers, and fiddled the other parameters. - Is ERRCODE_DATA_EXCEPTION (in xml.c) acceptable as error code for a type mismatch? Could not find anything better.

kind regards, Arie Bikker

../makepatch
-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to