On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 00:16, Tom Lane wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Neil Conway) writes: > >> If we're going to change the structure anyway, let's fix it to be > >> independent of NAMEDATALEN. > > > Sounds good. If we're making other backwards-incompatible changes to > > pgNotify, one thing that bugs me about the API is the use of "relname" > > to refer to name of the NOTIFY/LISTEN condition. > > I hear you ... but my proposal only requires a recompile, *not* any > source code changes. Renaming the field would break client source code. > I doubt it's worth that.
Okay, that's fair -- I'll leave it as it is. Cheers, Neil -- Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
