On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:30:03AM -0800, David E. Wheeler wrote: > On Feb 17, 2010, at 4:28 AM, Tim Bunce wrote: > > >> Yes, but if it's a variadic function, I suspect that it won't often be > >> called with the same number of args. So you'd potentially end up > >> caching a lot of extra stuff that would never be used again. > > > > Potentially. Patches welcome! > > GitHub. ;-P
http://github.com/timbunce/posgtresql-plperl-call > > Umm, perhaps F->funcname(@args), or PG->funcname(@args), or ... ? > > > > Anyone got any better suggestions? > > PG is good. Or maybe DB? On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 08:26:51AM +0000, Richard Huxton wrote: > > It's a module whose only use is embedded in a DB called PG - not > sure those carry any extra info. It also treads on the toes of > "PG->not_a_function" should such a beast be needed. > > I like "F->funcname" or "FN->funcname" myself. Thanks. I quite like FN. Anybody else want to express an opinion on the color if this bikeshed before I repaint it? Tim. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
