Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > Tom Lane wrote: > > Which leads me to the thought that rather than postponing running > > pgindent until late beta, maybe we should run it *now*, and get the > > bulk of its work done for the new code in 9.0. Then people would have > > a solid base to patch against, rather than having to expect a major > > merge hassle at the end of beta. > > > > > > > > > > (BTW, by "now" I don't mean *today* --- seems better to wait till > > alpha4 has been wrapped. But as soon as that's done.) > > > > > > I have a TODO on fixing some of the typedef finding. But I can generate > an up to date version of the list Bruce last used in a day or two, and > then get this better whacked into shape for another run at the more > traditional time.
I am ready to run pgindent whenever requested. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
