On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> Well, I'm a big fan of CREATE OR REPLACE anything so I like the patch >> regardless of whether it solves the current problem, but having said >> that, I'm not clear on whether it does in fact solve the current >> problem. When PL/pgsql is installed by default, is it going to end up >> owned by the DB owner, or might it end up owned by the superuser? > > It will be owned by the bootstrap superuser, so the case is exactly > the one that a non-superuser DBA would be faced with.
Or even a superuser other than the bootstrap superuser, no? I dump out the DB on my 8.4 server and try to reload on 9.0 with --single and it fails because, even though I'm a superuser, I can't replace a language owned by someone else? ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
