On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > It's *not an error* for a nonvolatile function to call a volatile one.
it should be considered an error i think, someone think there is a use cas for calling volatile functions inside stable ones but i can see what that reason could be... > At least it's never been in the past, and I'm sure you'd break some > applications if you made it so in the future. > i'm sure of that too, but in this case seems reasonable to do so -- Atentamente, Jaime Casanova Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL AsesorÃa y desarrollo de sistemas Guayaquil - Ecuador Cel. +59387171157 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers