Stefan Kaltenbrunner <ste...@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Nobody suggested dismissing it. The point was that it hasn't been >> tested adequately to justify applying it now.
> not sure what testing people want to get done though (there are a fair > amount of results and profiles in the thread)? Robert was complaining that the worst case hadn't been characterized adequately, which I agree with. We know it helps a lot on certain cases, but what's the downside? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers