Simon Riggs wrote: > Which is why, in the next paragraph, I proposed a way forwards...
Oh, sorry. > There are 3 use cases: PITR, file-based replication and streaming > replication. Having 3 separate sections would be less confusing since it > would allow focused examples. A final section could be the "master > reference" for defining those parameters. So having both separate and > combined sections may end up being less confusing. Isn't that pretty much what we have now, except that both file-based replication and streaming replication are under the HA section? Can you lay out a tree of the section titles you're suggesting? -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
