Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > Sure, I can easily do that, but I am not sure how to generate a typedef > > list for that release, except to use the old typedef collection method > > for that file. Is that OK? > > One of the things I noticed while patching was that the 8.3 typedef list > was missing xmlChar and a few other typedefs that are used a lot in that > file :-(. So please don't use the same method you used in 8.3.
Yes, I don't have libxml installed on this machine so it didn't pick up those typedefs. > I think it would be close enough to use the current (just added to CVS) > typedef list. Or use the one you used for 8.4 if you have it handy. > There is not a lot of difference between the 8.3 and current code in > that file, so either of those are probably going to give you the same > results. Done. Sorry for the delay. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com PG East: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
