In response to Bruce Momjian :
> Well, I can easily make it do what you expect, and I don't see many
> error returns in that area of the code, so I just wrote a patch that
> does what you would expect rather than throw an error.
Well, that's great and better than an error, thx.
> test=> select to_date('2010-7', 'YYYY-Q');
> to_date
> ------------
> 2011-07-04
> (1 row)
Is this per SQL-Spec? I would expect an error for a quarter not in
(1,2,3,4).
But stop, now i see:
test=*# select to_date('2010-02-29', 'YYYY-MM-DD');
to_date
------------
2010-03-01
(1 row)
So it is maybe a congruously behavior ;-)
Regards, Andreas
--
Andreas Kretschmer
Kontakt: Heynitz: 035242/47150, D1: 0160/7141639 (mehr: -> Header)
GnuPG: 0x31720C99, 1006 CCB4 A326 1D42 6431 2EB0 389D 1DC2 3172 0C99
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
