"Kevin Grittner" <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> writes:
> TODO "not wanted" entry rewritten to address just this one issue.
> The other issues raise in the original post are valid possible
> enhancements, or is there something else to list?:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-03/msg00257.php
I'm not too sure either way about the other items mentioned there.
But anyway the GROUP BY business is the only one that seems to come up
often enough to justify an explicit "no" listing.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
