On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 15:55 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 13:31 -0600, Alex Hunsaker wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:17, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > >>> You're not addressing the original point. I have been asked how would > >>> users know which tables have been removed and whether there is a way of > >>> checking that. > >> > >> Uhh... they wont be in the explain output... Seems simple enough. > > > That is exactly what I replied, though nobody felt that was a great > > answer. > > Who complained about that exactly? It seems like a perfectly > appropriate answer to me.
I'm relaying feedback from others not on this list. People expect me to do this. I shouldn't need to name them for us to accept the feedback, nor should there be doubt that I relay this accurately (why else would I raise the subject?!?). If it comes from me, I say so. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
