Ian Barwick <barw...@gmail.com> writes: > 2010/3/30 Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com>: >> we can use a non existing column "name". What does mean?
> FYI this has caused me (and presumably a few other people) a bit of > head-scratching, e.g.: > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2010-03/msg00362.php We could make that stop happening if we were willing to restrict the cases in which an I/O conversion would be applied, but I think the cure might be worse than the disease. It would be an entirely arbitrary restriction of a feature. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
