Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> writes:
> Oh, I agree.  Since we have a separate WALSender limit, it seems
> counter-intuitive and difficult-to-admin to have the WALSenders also
> limited by superuser_connections.  They should be their own separate
> connection pool, just like the other "background" processes.

+1

Regards,
-- 
dim

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to