Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> writes: > Oh, I agree. Since we have a separate WALSender limit, it seems > counter-intuitive and difficult-to-admin to have the WALSenders also > limited by superuser_connections. They should be their own separate > connection pool, just like the other "background" processes.
+1 Regards, -- dim -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers