Jaime Casanova <jcasa...@systemguards.com.ec> writes: > On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Not sure if this is good enough or we need to provide some more-obvious >> way of dealing with it.
> it's strange that a REVOKE doesn't clean what a GRANT did, and DROP > OWNED BY seems very dangerous (at least if i forgot to make REASSIGN > OWNED first). Agreed --- I fixed it so that granting or revoking back to the default permissions set will remove the entry. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers