On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 07:47 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > >> I've been thinking that the reason we weren't going to beta was >> because of the SR open items, but I'm starting to think there's not >> much left that really needs to be dealt with. The ones from that list >> I think we should fix yet are: >> >> - Walreceiver and dblink are not interruptible on win32. >> - The documentation needs to be improved (if there's still more to do) >> - Redefine smart shutdown in standby mode? (i'm working on this) >> - The replication connections consume superuser_reserved_connections slots. >> >> The other stuff strikes me as all window dressing. > > I'm not happy that "other stuff" just gets punted. Things should > definitely not be removed from Open Items list when there is still > discussion/objection on them. The purpose of discussion on hackers is so > that we take note of those items, not just shrug and walk away from them > because some weeks have passed since they were mentioned. I shouldn't > have to keep a personal list of things I've objected to, so I can refute > what other people say.
If we never removed anything upon which there wasn't 100% consensus, we would never release. But no one is talking about removing items without discussing them. We are talking about discussing the possibility of removing some of them. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers