On Apr 6, 2010, at 5:23 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > It has been suggested in the past that we should have a full DBD interface in > plperl, and indeed there was such an animal at one stage, although it was not > compatibly licensed, and it is probably now way out of date. > > The current plperl interface back into the database is a *much* thinner > veneer over SPI than a DBD interface would be. Someone could start a project > for a DBD interface for plperl, but it would be a non-trivial amount of work, > and it should probably not be done piecemeal.
That would be great, but my current need is far simpler than that. Best, David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
