On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 21:55, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes:
>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Takahiro Itagaki
>> <itagaki.takah...@oss.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>>> A patch attached. The name of "PGMODULEEXPORT" might be arguable.
>
>> I agree with this in principle, but won't this break every single
>> add-on module out there that supports Win32?
>
> The patch didn't touch the contrib modules, so why would it break
> third-party sources?

Oh, d'oh. I was clearly too tired when reading that thing. I was
thinking we required changes in the contrib modules/third party
modules, but they don't actually use DLLEXPORT, do they?

In that case, that argument clearly falls, and I'm in favour of the
patch :-) Just make sure you test it on both current and semi-old
versions of mingw, they tend to not always act the same way. Or just
get it in and the buildfarm can figure that part out for us.


-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to