On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:54 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>> OK, that looks a lot less risky than I had understood from discussions. >>> The main thing for me is it doesn't interfere with Startup or >>> WalReceiver, so assuming it works I've got no objections. Thanks for >>> chasing this down, good addition. >> >> Thanks. Committed. > > Thanks. The following TODO item should be removed? > > "Redefine smart shutdown in standby mode to exist as soon as all > read-only connections are gone." > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Standby_server_mode > > Or change it to something like? > > "Change smart shutdown in standby mode so that it kills the startup > and walreceiver process before waiting for the regular backends to die off"
Yeah, we should do one of those two things, but I don't much care which. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
